Mirtunjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68926 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-431 Year-2018 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== Mirtunjay Kumar Son of Parshuram Mandal, Resident of English Patam, P.S. Naya Ram Nagar, District-Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamal Kishore Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Binod Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 431 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is that he was trying to appear in On Line Railway Recruitment Board Examination in place of another candidate on the payment of Rs. 70,000/-. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68926 of 2018(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge XII, Patna, in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 431 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T