Kuldeep Das @ Kuldip Ravi Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51788 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-450 Year-2025 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== KULDEEP DAS @ KULDIP RAVI DAS S/o BHIKHARI DAS R/o vill - Parasi, P.s.- Jhajha, Distt.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 450 of 2025, F.I.R dated 15.09.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 126(2), 118 (2), 117 (2), 109 and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, on 15.09.2025, the informant Binod Das alleged that when his sister and wife went out to attend the call of nature, the petitioner and co-accused abused them. When the informant protested, the petitioner and co-accused allegedly assaulted him with a tangi (axe) and a sword, causing injuries to his hands while he tried to save himself. It is further alleged that the accused threatened to kill
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51788 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/3 him and abduct his sister if the matter was reported to the police.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case for malicious reasons for an on-going land dispute between them. It is the case of the petitioner that the informant who is said to have sustained grievous injuries during the course of alleged altercation, however, the injury is found to be simple in nature. It has next been submitted that the petitioner is a man of means and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application in respect of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts that the injury sustained by the informant which is found to be simple in nature and the petitioner having clean antecedent, accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51788 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with the aforementioned P.S. Case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Ajit Kumar, J) surya/- U T