← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10431/2021disposed

Suresh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-31Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10431 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2020 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Suresh Prasad, aged about 60 years, male, Son of Late Rama Prasad. 2.

Kapil Prasad @ Birendra Singh, aged about 70 years, male, Son of Late Joghi Prasadhi.

3.

Nagina Prasad @ Navin Prasad @ Gopji, aged about 65 years, male, Son of Late Joghi Prasadhi.

All are residents of Village - Dhibrapar, Police Station - Hilsa, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-03-2022 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Mr. Singh seeks permission to withdraw the application with respect to petitioner No. 1, namely, Suresh Prasad, who has been arrested.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10431 of 2021(3) dt.31-03-2022 2/3 Permission is granted.

The application with respect to petitioner No. 1 is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous. The petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 140 of 2020, dated 18.03.2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner No. 2 is said to have given orders, whereas the petitioner No. 3 is said to have assaulted one Lallan, who has received only simple injuries. The informant is said to have been assaulted by petitioner No. 1, who has now been arrested and his application has become infructuous.

This Court had called for the case diary vide order dated 21.02.2022 and had granted provisional bail to petitioner Nos. 2 and 3.

The case diary has since been received.

Regard being had to the fact that petitioner No. 2 is an order-giver, whereas petitioner No. 3 has causing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10431 of 2021(3) dt.31-03-2022 3/3 simple injuries to one Lallan, the provisional bail granted to them is, hereby, confirmed. They shall remain on the same bail bonds.

The application stands disposed off accordingly. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U T