← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49811/2019bail rejected

Anil Chaudhari @ Anil Kumar Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-08Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49811 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2019 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Anil Chaudhari @ Anil Kumar Chaudhari Son of Late Lapedu Chaudhari Resident of Village - Chainpur Dariyapur, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna -801109 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indra Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyadeo Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Head learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 311 of 2019, registered under Sections 30(a) and 38(ii) of the Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case and from perusal of the seizure list it would be evident that the exact position of the place from where the illicit liquor was recovered has not been disclosed in the seizure list. Learned counsel further submits that the same witnesses Upendra Paswan and Ravi Kumar have signed all the seizure lists including the seizure list prepared for the recovery allegedly

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49811 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 2/2 made from the house of the petitioner.

After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and taking into consideration the fact that illicit liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner, accordingly, in view of Full Bench Judgment passed in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 431 of 2019, I am not inclined to exercise my discretion under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. As such the present anticipatory bail application is rejected.

However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and seeks regular bail, the learned Court below shall consider his application for regular bail on the same day without being prejudiced to the fact that the present application has been rejected by this court.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) Rahul/- U T