← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16038/2019disposed

Raj Kumar Suman v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-06The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16038 of 2019 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Suman S/o Sri Raj Nandan Singh, Resident of Village Keshopur,Ward No.9, P.S. Barhara,Dist.Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate,Bhojpur 2.

The District Education Officer, Bhojpur 3.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Bhojpur. 4.

The District Certificate Officer, Bhojpur 5.

The Block Development Officer, Barhara,P.S. Barhara,Dist.Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 06-12-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "That the present writ petition is being preferred for setting aside the Certificate Case Nos. 2, 3 and 4 of 2017-18 on the ground of nullity including the continuation of 3 proceedings namely Criminal Case, Cancellation of Appointment and consequently Certificate Proceeding unreasonably or the certificate proceeding may be kept in abeyance till the final conclusion of investigation regarding acquisition in criminal activities and for the other necessary relief/ relief's on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case as stated hereinafter."

2/4 It is not in dispute that petition under Section 9 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is pending consideration/petitioner intends to file before the appropriate authority.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray that the instant petition be disposed of with direction to the appropriate authority to consider and decide the same expeditiously. Learned counsel for the State states that the appropriate authority shall consider and decide the petition filed/ to be filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Act positively within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner before him along with a copy of this order and the issue of limitation shall not come in the way of decision on merits.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

As such, petition stands disposed of in the following terms:- (a) Petitioner shall appear in the office of the appropriate authority on 23.12.2022 along with a copy of this order, on which date documents in support of the petition shall be filed, or else file a fresh petition under Section 9 of the Act.

3/4 (b) The appropriate authority shall consider and dispose of the petitioner's petition expeditiously, by a reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner before him and till then no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner; (c) The authority shall also examine as to whether the amount in question falls within the definition of public demand or not;

(d) Needless to add, while considering such petition, principles of natural justice shall be followed and due opportunity of hearing afforded to the parties; (e) Order assigning reasons shall be supplied to the parties;

(f) Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(g) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch; (h) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the appropriate authority, before the appropriate

4/4 forum, if so required and desired.

(i) We have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open;

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/Sujit AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 07.12.2022 Transmission Date