Dilip Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10131 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2020 Thana- KARAMCHAT District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Dilip Kumar Singh Son Of Ram Janam Singh Resident Of Village- Sabar, P.SKaramchat, District- Kaimur At Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 143, 341, 323, 307, 353, 224 of I.P.C. and Sections 30(a), 37(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons including the petitioner attacked on the police party and tried to get the arrested co-accused released from the police. Two liters liters wine is also recovered from the co-accused. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10131 of 2021(2) dt.26-05-2021 2/3 there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the disclosure made by co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. So far the allegation of assault is concerned, same is general and omnibus in nature. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 2 liters wine is recovered from the co-accused. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Karamchat P.S. case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10131 of 2021(2) dt.26-05-2021 3/3 Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T