Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69531/2018bail granted

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-05Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.69531 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2018 Thana- PARASI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sonu Kumar, Son of Shaligram Dube @ Shalikram Dube, R/o VillageBabhan Bigha, P.S.- Parasi, District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Excise Case No. 804 of 2018 (Parasi P.S. Case No. 45 of 2018) registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 9 litres of foreign liquor from the motorcycle. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69531 of 2018(2) dt.05-12-2018 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jehanabad, in connection with Excise Case No. 804 of 2018 (Parasi P.S. Case No. 45 of 2018) subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T