Rabindra Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.75565 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-763 Year-2018 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna ====================================================== Rabindra Das Son of Vindeshwar @ Vineshwar Das Resident of MohallaBudh NagarGali No.2,Police Station Kankarbagh,Distt.-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abdul Wadood, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 763 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant who is police officer has alleged that petitioner was apprehended with two stolen batteries. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case merely on suspicion. No theft article was recovered from the physical possession of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75565 of 2018(2) dt.18-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Madhu Singh, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 763 of 2018, subject to conditions:
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T