Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56380/2024bail granted

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-31Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56380 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2024 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Vishal Kumar Son Of Late Dilip Vishwakarma Village- Chhoti Mirza (MIZAPUR), Ps- Kasim Bazar, Dist- Munger ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Paras Nath, Adv For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Karpi (Shahar Telpa O.P.) P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024 dated 23.02.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 25 (1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information the police party conducted a raid and exposed a mini gun factory and recovered weapons, semi-made weapon and other articles used in manufacturing of the said weapons and apprehended the petitioner and the other co-accused persons from the house of the co-accused Raushan Kumar@ Laddu.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56380 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The said recovery was made from the house of the coaccused person. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 24.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42104/2024. The petitioner has one antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 24.02.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jehanabad in connection with Karpi (Shahar Telpa O.P.) P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T