Chandan Kumar Singh @ Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27015 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2015 Thana -SARAN GRP CASE District- SARAN ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Singh @ Chandan Kumar S/o Ravi Shankar Singh Resident of Village- Sahpur, PS- Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Bachan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Sonepur Rail P.S. Case No. 56 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the first information report, from conscious possession of other accused persons, one dagger, one puriya of Ganja, Chillam etc. were recovered. They have disclosed the name of the petitioner. The petitioner was not caught at the spot. The other accused person, namely, Dilip Kumar Gupta has already been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 935 of 2016. Shankar Kumar has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 3403 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27015 of 2016 (3) dt.12-07-2016 2/2 2016 and Nagendra Bhagat has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 58162 of 2015.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sonepur, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur Rail P.S. Case No. 56 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T