Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46301/2017bail granted

Subodh Kumar Singh @ Langra And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46301 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46301 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -273 Year- 2017 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Subodh Kumar Singh @ Langra

2. Amit Kumar .... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 273 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of about six litres of foreign liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, they have sufficiently been punished for the said offence as they have been in judicial custody since 25.07.2017 and have no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46301 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 273 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T