Ramu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53677 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2015 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

RAMU YADAV S/o- Late Bindeshwari Yadav Village- Rampur Ps- Pipra Dist- Supaul 2.

Pradeep Kumar son of Ramu Yadav Village- Rampur Ps- Pipra Dist- Supaul 3.

Chandeshwari Yadav son of Late Kankir Yadav Village- Rampur Ps- Pipra Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-08-2023 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.103 of 2015, registered for offences under Sections 323, 341, 379, 504, 506/34 of the IPC. 3.

The case of the prosecution, in brief, according to the informant, is that on 28.06.2015, at about 8-9 a.m., the accused persons, including the petitioners herein, who were variously armed, had arrived at the door of the house of the informant, whereafter they had abused and assaulted the informant and others.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53677 of 2023(2) dt.23-08-2023 2/3 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent, they have been falsely implicated in the present case and they are having a clean antecedent. The learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that a general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the accused persons, nonetheless, the fact remains that injuries whatsoever sustained by the injured persons have been found to be simple in nature.

5.

Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the materials available on record as also considering the fact that the injuries sustained by the injured persons, attributable to the petitioners herein, have been found to be simple in nature apart from the fact that the petitioners are having a clean antecedent, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioners to the privilege of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53677 of 2023(2) dt.23-08-2023 3/3 anticipatory bail.

7.

Accordingly, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.103 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U T