Ramnarayan Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13293 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.
Ramnarayan Das S/o Late Suresh Chandra Das, Resident of village- Baghar, P.S.- Balrampur, District-Katihar.
2.
Santosh Kumar Das, S/o Late Suresh Chandra Das, Resident of villageBaghar P.S.-Balrampur, District- Katihar. 3.
Kumeda Das, D/o Late Suresh Chandra Das, Resident of village- Baghar P.S.- Balrampur, District- Katihar.
4.
Baijanti Devi, D/o Late Suresh Chandra Das, W/o- Kilash Chandra Das Resident of Village- Singhdah, Sahebpur P.S.- Golepokhar, District- Uttar Dinajpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Katihar. 2.
The District Magistrate, Katihar.
3.
The Additional District Magistrate Cum Additional District Collector, Katihar.
4.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Katihar.
5.
The Circle Officer, Balrampur, District- Katihar. 6.
Ranglal Das, Son of Late Fagu Das, Resident of village- Baghar, P.S.- Balrampur, District- Katihar.
7.
Ram Sundar Das, Son of Late Gautam Das Resident of village- Baghar, P.S.- Balrampur, District- Katihar.
8.
Subal Kumar Das, Son of Gautam Kumar Das Resident of village- Baghar, P.S.- Balrampur, District- Katihar.
9.
Rana Das, Son of Late Gautam Das Resident of village- Baghar, P.S.- Balrampur, District- Katihar.
10.
Panishwar Das, Son of Gautam Das, Resident of Village- Singhdah, Sahebpur, P.S.- Golepokhar, District- Uttar Dinajpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, GA-10 Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to GA-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-09-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18.01.2024 passed by the Additional District Collector, Katihar
Patna High Court CWJC No.13293 of 2024(2) dt.05-09-2024 2/2 in Revision Case no. 66 of 2002, whereby and whereunder, the Additional District Collector, Katihar, set aside the order passed by the D.C.L.R, Barsoi, Katihar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that on being aggrieved by the order passed by the Circle Officer, Balrampur, the petitioner had preferred Mutation Appeal No. 25/2018-19 before the D.C.L.R., Balrampur, who having considered the matter has set aside the order of Circle Officer, Balrampur. Being aggrieved, respondents no. 6 to 10 preferred Mutation Revision Case no. 66 of 2022 and finally the order of the D.C.L.R, has been set aside confirming the order of the Circle Officer. Hence, the instant writ petition.
4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has adequate statutory remedy before the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna, under Section 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009.
5. In view of the efficacious alternative remedy, the writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to assail the impugned order before the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna.
(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U