Gajendra Prasad Yadav @ Gajendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57477 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2024 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== 1 .

Gajendra Prasad Yadav @ Gajendra Yadav S/o Late Mahendra Yadav R/o vill - Manganj, P.S. - Jadia, Distt.- Supaul 2.

Sudo Yadav S/o Late Mahendra Yadav R/o vill - Manganj, P.S. - Jadia, Distt.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State .

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191 ( 2 ), 190, 126 (2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 118 (1), 117 ( 2 ), 109 (1), 74, 352 and 351 ( 2 ) of BNS.

3 . As per the prosecution case , informant Shukani devi alleged that on 21.12.2024 , when son of informant was in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57477 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/3 his field, in the meantime , all the accused persons including these petitioners came there and petitioner No. 1 Gajendra Yadav gave farsa blow on the head of informant and petitioner No. 2 assaulted son of informant namely Shatrughan Yadav with iron rod due to which he sustained grievous injury .

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . Allegation of assault is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Injury caused by petitioner No. 1 is simple in nature . Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that injuries caused by petitioner No. 2 ( Sudo Yadav) is grievous in nature .

6 Considering the nature of injury caused by petitioner No. 2, his prayer for pre - arrest bail is rejected.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts, nature of injury caused by petitioner No. 1 and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner No. 1 as named above , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class Supaul in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57477 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 3/3 with Jadiya P.S. Case No. 237 of 2024 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T