← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/23/2017disposed

Hassan Imam v. The State Of Bihar Through The Agriculture Production Commissioner, Department Of Agriculture, Gove

2017-03-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.23 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.23 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9719 of 2016 ====================================================== Hassan Imam, son of Md. Hussainn Pahalwan, resident of Mohalla- Khajekala, P.S.- Khajekala (Patna City), District- Patna, Proprietor of M/s Hassan & Company in the premises of Krishi Utpadan Bazar Samiti, Musallahpur, Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Agriculture Production Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna-1, namely Sudhir Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner. 2.

The Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board through its Administrator, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna (Abolished) namely Sudhanshu Kumar Roy, son of not known to the petitioner.

3.

Sudhanshu Kumar Roy, son of not known to the petitioner, the Administrator, the Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna (Abolished).

4.

Md. Jahur, son of not known to the petitioner, the Special Officer, Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Musallahpur, Patna (abolished). 5.

M/s Md. Ahmad Mumtaz Ahmad, son of Md. Jainul Ahmad, shop No.58, Principal Market Yard, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aag13 Sarvesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 A show cause is being filed on behalf of the opposite parties through Mr. Ankit Katriar, learned Assisting Counsel Additional Advocate General No.13 enclosing the order disposing of the claim of the petitioner in preference to the private opposite party. Let the same be placed on record.

Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to question the same in an appropriate proceeding.

Permission is allowed.

The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U