Patna High CourtCWJC/786/2017disposed

Maryada Purushotam College Of Education v. Aryabhatta Knowledge University And ORS

2017-10-31Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.786 of 2017 =========================================================== Maryada Purushotam College of Education, Village/P.O.-Chilhari, TehsilDumraon, Town/City-Buxar, District-Buxar, Bihar-802101 through-Sri Hulkar, Son of Sri Attarlal, Treasurer, Indian Computer Education Society. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Chanakya National Law University Campus, Near Bus Stand, Mithapur, Patna through the Registrar.

2. The Vice-Chancellor, Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Chanakya National Law University Campus, Near Bus Stand, Mithapur, Patna.

3. The Registrar, Atyabhatta Knowledge University, Chanakya National Law University Campus, Near Bus Stand, Mithapur, Patna .

4. National Council for Teacher Education, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelakantha Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar (Orissa) through its Regional Director.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Giri, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kr. Mishra, Adv.

For the University : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Adv. For the NCTE : Mr. Sunil Kr. Singh, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT & ORDER Date: 31-10-2017 On perusal of the counter affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents-Aryabhatta Knowledge University, Patna (in

Patna High Court CWJC No.786 of 2017 dt.31-10-2017 2/2 short 'the University'), it appears that the grievance of the petitioner has been fully redressed inasmuch as the petitioner-college has been granted affiliation from the Academic Session 2016-17 with an annual intake of 100 for two basic units of 50 students each. The impugned order, dated 28.10.2016, has, thus, become redundant.

2. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the University, informs this Court that a formal communication, with respect to admission of additional 50 students, shall be made to the petitioner-college by today itself. 3.

This application stands disposed of accordingly.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 31/10/2017 Transmission Date N/A