Patna High CourtCR. REV./660/2016dismissed

Ekramul Haque And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-18Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.660 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Ekramul Haque, Son of Jakir Hussain

2. Jakir Husain son of Late Munsi Mian.

3. Imamul Haque, son of Jakir Hussain.

4. Shahnaz Begum, Wife of Shamim Ahmad.

5. Bhangi Yadav @ Bhangi Chaudhary Son of Late Rudal Chaudhary.

6. Shiv Nath Choudhary, Son of Late Ganga Chaudhary.

7. Kumari Devi, wife of Shiv Nath Chaudhary. All Resident of villageTirbirwa, P.S- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sri Sujit Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2017 The petitioners had been put on trial on the charge of commission of offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. By judgment and order, dated 03.05.2016, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge VIII, Gopalganj in S. T. No. 125 of 2012( CIS No. 205 of 2014), all the petitioners have been held guilty of the offence punishable under Sections 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In addition, the petitioner No.1 has been held guilty of the offence punishable under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code and petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 of the offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

After having held them guilty of the said offences, the Court below, considering their antecedent and good conduct during the trial, taking lenient view, instead of imposing sentence of imprisonment, has given them benefit of Sections 3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and, accordingly they have been released on furnishing probation bond of Rs. 5,000/-.

The said impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, VIII, Gopalganj, dated 03.05.2016, is being assailed in the present criminal revision application.

On perusal of the impugned judgment and order and the grounds taken on behalf of the petitioners, I do not find any merit in this application.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U