← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53312/2022bail granted

Abhishek Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-17Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53312 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2022 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Abhishek Kumar Pandey Son of Jitendra Pandey R/V- Semraw, P.S- Mirganj, Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 13.08.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 52 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the alleged motorcycle bearing registration no. BR 29T 2747. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that bag, in which illicit liquor was found, is not connected

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53312 of 2022(2) dt.17-10-2022 2/2 in any manner with petitioner and, as such, it cannot be said that recovery of illicit liquor was made from his conscious possession, who is a man of clean antecedent. While concluding the argument, it has categorically been submitted that investigation has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery not appears from conscious physical possession of this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Additional Session Judge II-cum-Speical Judge Excise-1, Gopalganj/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) pooja/- U T