Patna High CourtCWJC/845/2017dismissed

Banke Lal v. The Cheif Administrative Officer And ORS

2017-11-01Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.845 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Banke Lal, son of Jadu Yadav, Resident of Village/Mohalla - Belisarai, Near Pradeep Hotel, P.O and P.S. - Motihari Town, District - East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Cheif Administrative officer, Bihar State Sugar Corporation Ltd. at Ram Tahal Bhawan Baldeo Path, Punaichak, Patna - 800023 and Harihar Bhawan, Boring Canal Raod, Patna.

2. The General Manager, Bihar State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Unit Louriya, West Champaran, P.O. and P.S. - Lauriya, District - West Champaran.

3. The Chief Administrator, Bihar State Sugar Corporation Ltd., Ram Tahal Bhawan, Baldeo Path, Punaichak, Patna.

4. The Deputy Registrar, Bihar State Sugar Corporation Ltd., Patna.

5. The Managing Director-cum-Sugar Cane Commissioner, Bihar State Sugar Corporation Ltd. New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna and Bihar State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan (East), Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-11-2017 Heard the parties.

In the present case, petitioner is claiming for payment of Rs.1,61,591/- as he has supplied gas and welding materials which has been mentioned in the letter dated 16.9.1999. Certain payment has been made but he has not been paid Rs. 1,61,591/-.

Learned counsel for the Sugar Corporation has taken a plea that this writ petition suffers from delay and laches as well as he has claimed that record may not be available with

Patna High Court CWJC No.845 of 2017 (2) dt.01-11-2017 Corporation after such a long period so it is very difficult to find out the actuality of the outstanding dues. The present matter is too stale and same cannot be looked into by this Court.

Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U