Pramod Kumar Yadav @ Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.71958 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2018 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV @ PRAMOD YADAV @ PRAMOD KUMAR, S/o Banilal Yadav, Resident of Village- Tamout Parsa, P.S.- Murliganj, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 21-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Madhepura P.S. Case No. 238 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 379 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. Alleged motorcycle has not been recovered from his possession. His name has been disclosed by co-accused, Rajdeep Kumar, in his confessional statement from whose possession stolen motorcycle of this case was recovered.

It has come during investigation that on the basis of disclosure made by Rajdeep Kumar, one motorcycle has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71958 of 2018(3) dt.21-12-2018 2/2 recovered from the house of the petitioner for which separate case has been registered against the petitioner vide Madhepura P.S. Case No.10 of 2018.

Petitioner is said to be in custody since 14.05.2018. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 238 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- Rohit Kr.

U T