Krishna @ Krishnandan Ray @ Krishna Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49643 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Krishna @ Krishnandan Ray @ Krishna Ray Son of Late Tapeshwar Ray Resident of Village- Tikam, P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Madhuban P.S. Case No. 57 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354(B), 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, petitioner is said to have given Bhala blow on the chest of informant.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner and informant are agnates and petitioner is cosharer. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2019 having clean antecedent. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49643 of 2019(3) dt.06-11-2019 2/2 named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 57 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T