← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63318/2021bail granted

Md. Lal @ Lalwa @ Mustkim @ Lalo v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-15Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63318 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2020 Thana- BIRPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== MD. LAL @ LALWA @ MUSTKIM @ LALO Son of Md. Mokim Mian @ Md. Mokim Resident of Village- Lalpur Goth, Ward No. 14, P.S.- Birpur, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 15-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, three accused persons on motorcycles dispossessed the informant of Rs. 20,000/- in cash, two mobile phones, motorcycle besides other articles as mentioned in the FIR.

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the FIR was registered against unknown. Referring to the order of the learned court below whereby the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected, it is submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63318 of 2021(2) dt.15-04-2022 2/2 the name of the petitioner transpired in the alleged confessional statement of co-accused made before police. The cause of false implication of the petitioner is his criminal antecedent. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession. Inspite of the petitioner being in custody since 1.7.2021, he has not been put on T.I. parade. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

Heard learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the petitioner not having been put on T.I. parade inspite of being in custody for 9 months and investigation in the case having concluded, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Birpur P.S. Case no. 43 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Birpur, Supaul.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Spd/- U T