Satya Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4287 of 2021 ====================================================== Satya Narayan Singh Son of Late Ramji Singh, Resident of Village-Semra, P.S.-Natwar, District-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bikramganj, District-Rohtas. 4.

The Circle Officer, Dinara, District-Rohtas.

5.

Ram Nagina Sharma, Son of Late Shyam Bihari Sharma, Resident of Village-Semra, P.S.-Natwar, District-Rohtas.

6.

Sri Bhagwan Sharma, Son of Late Shyam Bihari Sharma, Resident of Village-Semra, P.S.-Natwar, District-Rohtas.

7.

Ram Kripal Singh, Son of Late Ram Surat Singh, Resident of VillageSemra, P.S.-Natwar, District-Rohtas. 8.

Daroga Singh, Son of Late Ram Surat Singh, Resident of Village-Semra, P.S.-Natwar, District-Rohtas.

9.

Mithilesh Singh, Son of Late Dharmapal Singh, Resident of Village-Semra, P.S.-Natwar, District-Rohtas.

10.

Baban Singh, Son of Late Bhikhari Singh, Resident of Village-Semra, P.S.- Natwar, District-Rohtas.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-08-2022 Though the present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction upon the respondents to remove the encroachment made over the public land, appertaining to Plot No. 788, Khata No. 150, Thana No. 208 of village Semra, Anchal Dinara, P.S. Natwar, District-Rohtas, but the learned counsel for

Patna High Court CWJC No.4287 of 2021(2) dt.26-08-2022 2/2 the petitioner has confined his relief to grant of liberty to the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer, Dinara, District-Rohtas i.e. the Respondent No. 4 for removal of the encroachment in question. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

It is needless to state that in case, appropriate petition is filed by the petitioner under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 before the Respondent No. 4 within a period of four weeks from today, the Respondent No. 4 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law and after hearing the affected parties, within a period of twelve weeks, thereafter.

The writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U