Surendra Prasad Singh @ Surendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53449 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1558 Year-2021 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

SURENDRA PRASAD SINGH @ SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE MASUDAN BAIDH R/O VILLAGE- KAMALPUR, P.S.- SAJOUR, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR 2.

DHANANJAY KUMAR SON OF ISAWARY SINGH R/O VILLAGEDADPUR, P.S.- BELAGNJ, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

PRIYA RANJAN DAS SON OF LATE SITA RAM DAS R/O VILLAGEMUKHERIYA, P.S.- JAGDISHPUR, P.O.- KHUTAHA, DISTRICTBHAGALPUR ... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the State :

Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 466, 216, 166 (4) & 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they were found negligent in not returning the warrant to the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53449 of 2022(2) dt.14-12-2022 2/2 Trial Court on time.

The petitioners are quite innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case with malicious intention just to save the senior police officials. The allegations levelled against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature. Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioners is serious in nature. They were found guilty in the enquiry report of the City Superintendent of Police, hence they do not deserve anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected. However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U