Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71557/2018bail granted

Chanchal Tanti And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.71557 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2018 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ======================================================

1. Chanchal Tanti.

2. Ranjan Tanti, Both are Sons of Gaya Tanti Both are Resident of Village-Sawasun, Police Station-Tekari and District-gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No-2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Tekari (Panchanpur O.P.) P.S.Case No.306 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is about recovery of one motorcycle from in front of the house of the petitioners. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that seizure list itself creates doubt about recovery and the petitioners are in custody since 15.8.2018. The petitioners have o criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71557 of 2018(2) dt.10-12-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and they have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-VI, Gaya in connection with Tekari (Panchanpur O.P.) P.S.Case NO.306 of 2018..

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T