Ravi Ranjan Pandey @ Bare Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4360 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2018 Thana- SURYAPUR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Pandey @ Bare Pandey son of Sri Niwas Pandey, R/o. VillageKharoj, P.S. Suryapura, District- Rohtas ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 13-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 27.09.2018 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Rohtas at Sasaram, in Registered Case No.261 of 2018, arising out of Suryapura Police Station Case No.85 of 2018, registered under Sections 341/323/354B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 37(a) (b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4360 of 2018 dt.13-12-2018 2/2 Considering the nature of allegation against the appellant and the period of custody of the appellant since 01.08.2018 as well as the statement of the appellant on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 15.12.2018 Transmission Date 15.12.2018