Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75111/2018bail granted

Md. Anwar @ Anwar Alam @ Md. Anwar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-14Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75111 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2018 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ==================================================== Md. Anwar @ Anwar Alam @ Md. Anwar Alam S/o Dabiruddin, Resident of village- Rajakhar Ward No. 1, P.S. & District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 342 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is of purchase of stolen vehicle which was recovered from his possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 25.08.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria, in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 342 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75111 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T