← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13919/2022dismissed

Hari Kumar Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-09Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13919 of 2022 ====================================================== Hari Kumar Agarwal S/o Late Ram Kumar Agarwal Resident of VillageAdarsh Gram, Akbar Malahi, @ Sarai Station Road, P.S.- Sarai, DistrictVaishali. Pin- 844125. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

The Regional Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

6.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 7.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Vigilance, Government of Bihar, Patna. 8.

The Additional Director General, Vigilance, Bihar, Patna. 9.

Vinay Kumar S/o Late Vishwanath Chaudhary Clerk (Lipik), at District Education Office, East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Shilpa Singh ( GA 12 ) :

Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA 12 For Vigilance :

Ms. Archana Palkar Khopde, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief :- " (i) For issuance of writ of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents no. 7 and 8 to order for enquiry and take necessary action on the application filed by the petitioner as contained in Annexure-2 series of this writ application which was filed

Patna High Court CWJC No.13919 of 2022(2) dt.09-05-2023 2/2 before them against respondent no. 9 in light of Memo no. 6268/2021 dated 29.06.2021, as contained in annexure-3 issued by respondent no. 1."

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U