Rakesh Kumar @ Babloo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49534 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2019 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== RAKESH KUMAR @ BABLOO Son of Om Prakash Singh, Resident of Village-Daulatpur (Simari), P.S.-Bihta, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shakti Suman Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 205 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 149, 341, 448, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation has been made that the accused persons are neighbour and they forcibly entered into the house of informant, assaulted and ransacked the entire house. Allegation has been made against the petitioner to have taken away Rs.30,000/-.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they are agnates and petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case, inasmuch as against the petitioner, there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49534 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 2/2 only allegation of taking away Rs.30,000/-.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.205 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T