← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3430/2021disposed

Md. Zaki Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-15Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3430 of 2021 ====================================================== Md. Zaki Alam, Son of Late Abdul Rahman, Resident of Sultanganj, Khan Mirja, Neemtal, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Block C, Patna.

3.

The Finance and Accounts Controller, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Block C, Patna.

4.

The Executive Officer, New Capital Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Adv.

For the PMC :

Mr. Sanjay Prasad Verma, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Sushant Praveen ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-01-2024 Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna Municipal Corporation, seeks permission to file a supplementary counter affidavit bringing on record the statements showing payment of all the admissible dues to the petitioner.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. The supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record, wherein a categorical assertion has been made in paragraph-4 thereof that differential

Patna High Court CWJC No.3430 of 2021(6) dt.15-01-2024 2/2 amount of dearness allowance, differential amount of pension in the light of 6th pay revision and further differential amount of ACP have been paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, in fact, the entire sanctioned amount in favour of the petitioner, as has been mentioned in paragraphs6 to 10 have been paid to the petitioner.

5. In view of the averments made in the supplementary counter affidavit, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U