Sintu Kumar Singh@Sintu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10639 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-587 Year-2020 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SINTU KUMAR SINGH@SINTU SINGH SON OF PRAMOD SINGH @ PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH VILLAGE- GOBIND PHULKAHA, P.S.- KANTI (PANAPUR) DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Kanti P.S. Case No. 587 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10639 of 2021(2) dt.22-01-2022 2/2 dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T