← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14022/2022dismissed

Nilam Kumari v. The Union Of India

2024-03-12Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14022 of 2022 ====================================================== Nilam Kumari wife of Pramod Kumar Choudhary, resident of Quarter No. 221/C-D, ABC New Colony, Khagaul, P.S.- Khagaul, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Railway, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi.

2.

The Divisional Railway Manager, Signal and Telecommunication, Danapur, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

3.

The Senior Section Engineer, Telecom/G, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

4.

The Senior Divisional Finance Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

5.

The Divisional Signal and Telecom Engineer, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

6.

Umesh Kumar son of name not known Chief Office Superintendent, Mandal Railway, Administration, Signal and Telecom Department, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

7.

Satyendra Kumar, Chief Office Superintendent, Mandal Railway, Administration, Signal and Telecom Department, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

8.

The Chief Commissioner, For Persons with Disabilities (Divyangjan) Department of Empowerment and Persons with Disabilities (Divyangjan), Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, New Delhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gautam Shah, Adv.

For the UOI :

Mr. K.N.Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Anwar Karim, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CWJC No.14022 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/3 12-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of order dated 28.9.2018 passed by the Respondent No.8 whereby claim of petitioner for giving her privilege/benefit of Physically Handicapped (Disabilities Act, 2016) has been refused and further the complaint made against respondent nos. 6 and 7 and other officials have not been considered and also humiliate and harassed for being disabled person. (ii). For issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus direction to Respondents to give all the benefits of physically handicapped to the petitioner accordant to the Right of Persons with Disabilities.

(iii). For direction to Respondents to make payment of arrear of salary to the petitioner for the period from March, 2017 to May, 2017 and of dated 5.6.2017 showing her present on duty.

(iv). For direction to Respondents to take disciplinary action against Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and other officials for harassed and humiliate to the petitioner and also ever using filthy and objectionable language and torturing to the petitioner as being disable women."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however,

Patna High Court CWJC No.14022 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 3/3 seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondents authorities for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U