Uday Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29736 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -105 Year- 2014 Thana -SHAKURABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Uday Yadav S/o Shri Kanahai Yadav Resident of Village- Mahadeo Bigha, Post- Kamalpur, Police Station - Tikari, District Gaya. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : M/s Jai Ram Singh and Priyank Deepak, Advocates For the State : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 02-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation, the petitioner had taken Rs. 30,000/- as an advance being the third partner of the concerned firm, which consists of four partners, for the purpose of supply of bricks but due to closure of the Brick kiln the bricks were not supplied nor has the advanced money been returned.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 15,000/- to the informant which may be allowed to be paid within certain period.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioner, namely, Uday Yadav, be released on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29736 of 2016 (3) dt.02-09-2016 bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in Shakurabad Police Station Case No. 105/2014 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- ( Ten Thousand Rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Hari Prasad, Sub Judge I, Jehanabad subject to the conditions laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
At the time of furnishing of bail bond, the petitioner would be required to deposit Rs. 15,000/- in the court below and the informant would be at liberty to withdraw the same, however, the same would be subject to the result of this case/trial and without prejudice to the petitioner's stand which he may be taking during the course of trial.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U T