Faizan Ansari @ Faizan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51692 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2026 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Faizan Ansari @ Faizan S/O Firoz @ Md. Firoz @ Md. Firoj R/O MohallaYusufGanj, PS- Laherisasari, Distt- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Padmanabh Kashyap, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 109 of 2026 dated 02.03.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109/303(2)/351(2)/352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant and Md. Faizullah were allegedly intercepted by the accused persons, including the petitioner, who demanded money. It is alleged that co-accused Fuqran stabbed the informant on the head with a knife while the petitioner stabbed Md. Faizullah on the head. It is further alleged that Ayan Khan and Sajik also assaulted him and Fuqran snatched Rs. 12,000/-.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51692 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that the injury which has been sustained by the Informant is not attributable to the petitioner as is evident from the F.I.R. while the person, who is said to have been assaulted by the petitioner, there is no injury caused to him. It is further submitted that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he is enjoying privilege of bail and even the compromise has also been arrived between the parties.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the injury which has been sustained by the Informant is not attributable to the petitioner and, as also, the fact that the person, who is said to have been assaulted by the petitioner, there is no injury caused to him, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 109 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51692 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 3/3 2026, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T