Ranjeet Prasad @ Ranjeet Kumar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11847 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2018 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== RANJEET PRASAD @ RANJEET KUMAR PRASAD, SON OF KRISHNA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAHLA, HAJARI TOLA, P.S.- BARAULI, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shiv Sager Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 11-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegations in the FIR, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are stated to have abused and assaulted the informant and others. It is stated that the petitioner threw acid on the nephew of the informant causing injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations as levelled in the FIR are false and concocted. There is case and counter case between the parties. From perusal of the injury report of Prabhu Prasad it transpires

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11847 of 2021(3) dt.11-08-2021 2/2 that he also has sharp cutting injury which is attributable to coaccused Dhruv Prasad who has been enlarged on bail. The petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2020 and has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP for the State.

On perusal of the injury report of Prabhu Prasad it transpires that the allegations of acid being thrown by the petitioner herein is substantiated by the injury report with the nature of injury having been found to be grievous. The Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail on completing one year in custody.

Spd/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T