← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54085/2022bail granted

Indal Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-16Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54085 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-400 Year-2022 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Indal Sahni Son of Chhote Lal Sahni Resident of village - Mahammadpur Badal, P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur 2.

Shivchandra Sahni Son of Satahu Sahni Resident of village - Mahammadpur Badal, P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur 3.

Shambhu Sahni Son of Lakhi Sahni Resident of village - Mahammadpur Badal, P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Sakra P.S. Case no. 400 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Prosecution case relates to recovery of 28 liters illicit country made liquor near a water tank.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. They have got no criminal antecedent. Petitioners have no concern with the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54085 of 2022(2) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 alleged recovery of illicit liquor or with the place of occurrence. The name of the petitioners have been disclosed in this case by the apprehended persons from the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that neither the petitioners were arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from their conscious possession.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Sakra P.S. Case no. 400 of 2022, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Excise Court No.1, Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T