Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76120 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2012 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Munna Kumar, s/o Rajendra Yadav @ Rajendra Pd. R/o village- Devria, P.S. +Dist. Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 07 of 2012 registered for the offence punishable under Section 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act. Informant who is the Police officer has alleged that on secret information that some criminals has assembled to commit some dacoity, he reached said place and on seeing police party criminals assembled there fled away, however, two of them were apprehended by the police and one of them apprehended accused Gautam Kumar confessed the name of petitioner to be present who had fled away. Nothing has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76120 of 2018(2) dt.18-12-2018 2/2 recovered from the possession of petitioner and he has been remanded in this case on 04.08.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 07 of 2012 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T