Md. Sajid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51789 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
Md. Sajid, S/O Md. Rizwan Resident of Village-Banhara, PO-Khidirchak Ward no. 18, PS-Bhagwanpur, Distt-Begusarai 2.
Md. Hussain, S/O Md. Rizwan Resident of Village-Banhara, PO-Khidirchak Ward no. 18, PS-Bhagwanpur, Distt-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar- Advocate For the State :
Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey- A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam- Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3), 308(4), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are own brothers of the informant and are having dispute relating to property. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51789 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 disclosed his relationship with the petitioners rather has given an impression in the FIR that criminals came and started demanding an extortion of Rs. One Lac and when the same was objected, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that even female members of the family have been implicated. It is next submitted that no doubt, on account of dispute relating to property, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other, but then, injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature.
4. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then, are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners and the informant are brothers and are having dispute relating to property and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51789 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with G.R. No.1209 of 2025 arising out of Bhagwanpur P. S. Case No.87 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
6. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T