Md. Safiruddin @ Jamil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49082 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -356 Year- 2014 Thana -JOKIHAT District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Md. Safiruddin @ Jamil son of Late Chirag Ali, resident of village Gairki Tola, Bageshwari, P.S. Jokihat, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Imteyaz Ahmad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the Petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2014 and the entire case is based on documentary evidence which has already been collected, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No.356 of 2014, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Md. Arsad Jamil, son of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49082 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015 2/2 Petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T