Abhishek Kumar v. The Magadh University Through Registrar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5383 of 2017 =========================================================== Abhishek Kumar, Son of Mithilesh Kumar, Resident of Village-Akbarpur, P.O.- Bakawan, Police Station-Bhadour, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Magadh University, through Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya

2. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya

3. The Pre-Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

4. The Examination Controller, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

5. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For Magadh University : Dr. K.N.Singh, Advocate Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Magadh University.

The petitioner seeks direction to the respondentsMagadh University for issuance of original certificate of having passed B.Sc. Physics (Hons) examination in 2013, which he is said to have passed in second class.

The petitioner contends that though he has been given provisional certificate and marks sheet for the said examination, the original certificate has, so far, not been issued. It is also the case of the petitioner that he had appeared in Part-I examination of B. Sc. Physics (Hons.) in 2007 and Part-II in 2008 and thereafter he had taken admission in Part-III in the

Patna High Court CWJC No.5383 of 2017 dt.12-04-2017 2/2 session 2012-13 in K.P.S. College, Nadwa wherefrom he appeared in Part-III examination and cleared the examination in 2013.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the Controller of Examination, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya to take a final decision in this regard in view of what has been contended by the petitioner in the present writ application. The Controller of Examination shall consider the contents of the present writ application as representation on behalf of the petitioner and pass an order within a period of one week. It should be duly communicated to the petitioner immediately thereafter.

The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) S.Pandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.04.2017 Transmission Date