← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14337/2015disposed

Umesh Prasad v. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation And ORS

2016-05-05Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14337 of 2015 =========================================================== Umesh Prasad Son of Late Bishu Prasad Resident of Village - Bale Bigha, P.O. - Done, P.S. - Hisua, District - Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, through its Administrator, Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

2. Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

3. Chief Mechanical Engineer, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

4. Divisional Manager, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Muzaffarpur Division, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate. For the B.S.R.T.C : Mr. N. K. Singh, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-05-2016 Heard parties.

This writ petition has been field for grant of interest upon the retiral benefits which has already been paid to the petitioner. It is contended that such interest has been granted to several other employees, however none of them stands mentioned in the writ petition.

However this writ petition is being disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities itself for redressal of this grievance. If such representation is filed along with disclosing the names of the persons and specific relevant orders by

Patna High Court CWJC No.14337 of 2015 dt.05-05-2016 2/2 which such interests has been paid to several other employees, let the Administrator consider the case of the petitioner also if such payment has been made to other employees of the Corporation as being claimed by the petitioner. It is expected that a decision in this regard will be taken within a period of six months.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) ravi/- U