Patna High CourtCWJC/12707/2012disposed

Ruby Devi v. The Union Of India And ORS

2016-08-05Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12707 of 2012 =========================================================== Ruby Devi, wife of Sri Surya Kant Mishra, resident of Village - Kachchavi, Police Station - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India , through the Chairman, Baharat, Petroleum Corporation Limited, New Delhi

2. The General Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited having its Office At Ashiyana Chamber 3rd Floor, Exhibition Road, Patna, Police Station, Patna, District - Patna

3. The Regional Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited having its office at Ashiyana Chamber, 3rd Floor, Exhibition Road, Patna, Police Station & District - Patna

4. The State co-ordinator Officer, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited having its office at Ashiyana Chamber, 3rd Floor, Exhibition Road, Patna, Police Station & District - Patna

5. Hira Devi wife of Sri Siya Ram Karak resident of Village - Chanauraganj, Police Station - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhas Ranjan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-08-2016 The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the Mark-sheet obtained by the candidates for the purpose of dealership of Bharat Petroleum at Jhanjharpur (N.H. 57) dated 21.06.2012 (Annexure-4) issued under the signature of its Chairman, and for issuance of fresh Mark-sheet.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12707 of 2012 dt.05-08-2016 2/2

2. Without going into the objection of the respondent Corporation with respect to maintainability of the writ petition, with consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue her representation dated 28.06.2012 said to have been filed before the respondent Corporation. If the petitioner satisfies the Corporation that such representation was filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Corporation on its own merits in accordance with law.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date