Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52993/2022dismissed

Amarjit @ Amarjit Kumar @ Ajit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-11Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52993 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2021 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Amarjit @ Amarjit Kumar @ Ajit Yadav Son Of Raj Kumar Yadav Resident Of Village - Mathurapur, Parasi, P.S.- Noorsarai, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather 20 liters of country made liquor is said to have recovered from the motorcycle. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52993 of 2022(2) dt.11-11-2022 2/2 submits that the petitioner is the owner of the motorcycle. He further submits that petitioner has criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is the owner of the seized motorcycle.

Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 226 of 2021.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T