Dharmendra Kumar Gupta @ Dharmendra Krantikari v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6695 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta @ Dharmendra Krantikari Son of Sri Vijay Kumar Prasad Resident of Village- Madhopur, P.S. Barauli, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India , Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, through the Secretary.

2. The Additional Secretary, (N.R.H.M.- 1 Section) Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi.

3. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Health Department , Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Family Welfare Building, Sheikhpura, Patna.

6. The Mission Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Family Welfare Building, Sheikhpura, Patna.

7. The Team Leader, A.R.C. State Health Society, Bihar, Family Welfare Building, Sheikhpura, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnakar Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anujit Sinha, AC to PAAG-2 For U.O.I. Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Dr. Punam Singh, CGC =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 18-08-2017 This petition in public interest has been filed seeking a mandamus to Respondent No.2 to implement certain statutory scheme under the National Health Mission and to enter into a contract in the matter of payment of honorarium to Aasha workers, the same cannot be entertained, more so when we are informed by the learned Addl. Solicitor General Shri S.D. Sanjay, that at the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6695 of 2017 dt.18-08-2017 2/2 instance of the aggrieved person already orders have been passed by Single Benches of this Court.

It is for the aggrieved persons who are working under the scheme to ventilate their grievance. At the instance of the petitioner, an outsider, in this Public Interest Litigation, we see no reason to make any indulgence.

The application is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 24.8.2017 Transmission Date N/A