Ravin Sahni @ Ravindra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10937 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2020 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
RAVIN SAHNI @ RAVINDRA SAHNI SON OF KAL MOHAN SAHNI RESIDENT OF SAKIN- BINDULIYA, P.S- KHODAWANPUR, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI 2.
SONI DEVI @ SONIYA DEVI WIFE OF RAVIN SAHNI RESIDENT OF SAKIN- BINDULIYA, P.S- KHODAWANPUR, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI 3.
KAUSHAL KUMAR SON OF RAVIN SAHNI RESIDENT OF SAKINBINDULIYA, P.S- KHODAWANPUR, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioners
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Samir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Asha Kumari, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-07-2021 . In view of sudden resurgence of COVID - 19 infection there is limited functioning of the High Court and therefore the matter has been listed for consideration through virtual mode. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the informant as well as learned APP for the State. This Court would expect that the petitioner's Counsel would honour his undertaking in the instant proceedings regarding supply of requisite court fee etc. within two weeks from the date he is called upon to do so by the office.
Petitioner seeks bail in Khodawandpur PS Case No. 99 of 2020 registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the IPC. The allegation in the FIR is that the informant's daughter has been done to death at her matrimonial home by the husband and all the in-laws. The allegation is that she has been killed on account of non fulfillment of demand for a Bullet motorcycle by the husband, and some money as dowry.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 are father-in-law, mother-in-law and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10937 of 2021(2) dt.06-07-2021 2/2 brother-in-law respectively. They have no concern with the life and affairs of the deceased and her husband as they are separate in mess and worship from before. By virtue of their relationship they have been implicated with general and omnibus allegation. They are in custody since 15.9.2020. It is submitted that the husband is already in jail.
Learned Counsel for the informant and the learned APP have opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the rival submissions as also the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM Manjhaul, Begusarai in Khodawandpur PS Case No. 99 of 2020 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U T