Janki Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2236 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.287 of 2023 ====================================================== Janki Devi W/o Late Gopalji Singh, resident of Village and P.O.-Saraiya, P.S.- Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Mr. Amir Subhani, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Sri Gopal Meena, the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
3.
Sri Pranav Kumar, The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 4.
Sri Raj Kishore Trivedi, The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Muzaffarpur. 5.
Sri Satyajit Sanjay, The Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur. 6.
Sri Vijay Thakur, The Block Development Officer, Kanti, Muzaffarpur. 7.
Sri Niraj Kumar Ranjan, The Block Development Officer, Kudhani, Muzaffarpur.
8.
Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, The Accountant General Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Gupta (GP- 10) Mr. Virendra Kuar, AC to GP-10 For the A.G.
:
Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard Mr. Raju Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Virendra Kuar, learned AC to GP10 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, learned counsel for the Accountant General.
2. Mr. Virendra Kuar, learned AC to GP-10 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, learned counsel for the Accountant General jointly inform that they have
Patna High Court MJC No.2236 of 2023(4) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 already filed show cause on behalf of the respective opposite parties giving information that the order dated 19.04.2023 passed in CWJC No. 287 of 2023 has been complied with.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the liberty be given to file fresh writ petition in case any amount still remains due to be paid to the petitioner.
4. Considering the aforesaid submission on behalf of the parties, the present contempt petition is disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U