Rahul Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54934 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR SINGH Son of Uday Kumar Singh @ Uday Singh Resident of village - Sirka, Vijulpur Lala Patti, Police Station - Baikunthpur, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused person has fired upon the informant which hit on his nose and he sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54934 of 2025(2) dt.19-08-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the informant himself planned to kill the petitioner at a lonely place with the help of other persons and during scuffle the informant sustained injury on his nose. The petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2025 and has got two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T