Indrajeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51403 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2015 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== INDRAJEET PASWAN, Son of Ram Kumar Paswan Resident of VillageGaur Andhara, Police Station- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Sunita Devi Wife of Indrajeet Paswan D/o Musan Paswan Resident of Village-Gaur Andhara, Police Station- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani, At present resident of village- Bhupatti, Police station- Babubarhi, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2020 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 453 of 2015 disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 384, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Case is under Section 498A of IPC with an allegation of demand and torture.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep her with dignity and care and it is the opposite party no.2 who is not ready to reside with him. On notice by this Court, she has not appeared, though the notice was received by her father.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51403 of 2019(6) dt.08-01-2020 2/2 Heard learned APP also and perused the impugned order, it appears that such submission has been made before the learned Additional Sessions Judge also while hearing the bail application and on that opposite party no.2 had appeared and shows her desire to reside with the petitioner, but the petitioner does not chose to appear before the learned Additional Sessions Judge.

Having heard both sides, considering the allegation and conduct of the petitioner, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T