Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76666/2018bail granted

Raushan Kumar @ Gautam Kuamr @ Nanhaka v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-19Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76666 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2018 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Gautam Kuamr @ Nanhaka, Son of Pundeo Yadav @ Puny Dev Yadav, Resident of Village- Tarari, Tola- Daulatpur, P.S. Konch, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Saxena For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Delha P.S. Case No. 234 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is of recovery of 27 litres of desi Malta wine from two bag which was being carried by the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 23.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76666 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 234 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (4). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/manojU T