Amrendra Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75071 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2018 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi ======================================================

1. Amrendra Kumar son of Mukti Lal Rai

2. Ranjit Yadav son of Nandan Yadav Both are residence of Masaha Narottam, Ward No. 10, P.S. Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners, who are in custody, seek bail in connection with Mejorgunj P.S. Case No. 382 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against petitioners that they threw the bag containing illicit liquor of Nepali Soffi of 72 litres kept in Sack and on seeing police and tried to flee away but they were apprehended. Petitioners have denied that said sack belongs to them and they were arrested on suspicion only. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75071 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 since 27.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.-II cum Specil Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with Mejorgunj P.S. Case No. 382 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(4) If the petitioners is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel their bail bonds.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T